Freedman and Jurafsky’s research
make deep inroads into how language and culture are connected. What their work suggests
is that there is a distinction between the language used by the higher socio-economic
classes and the lower ones. Food advertisers take advantage of this distinction
by marketing specific brands to each class through use of class-specific
diction on the packaging. One of the most interesting points they made is the
connection between health, class and food advertising. It is a well-documented
fact that members of a higher demographic usually lead much healthier lives. Freedman
and Jurafsky postulate that more expensive chips employ diction such as “natural”
or “zero trans fat” on the packaging while less expensive chips forgo phrases
such as those. The chips then appear healthier when really all chips are
similar in healthiness despite who they are marketed to.
The methods Freedman and Jurafsky’s
applied to potato chips can be used with almost any mass-marketed product. I
could imagine it being used with diapers and other baby-care products. Similar
to potato chips, diapers are a necessity for both upper and lower class families.
I would suspect that the findings would correlate with their previous study in
that different brands employ varied diction and word complexity to appeal to
different socio-economic classes.
No comments:
Post a Comment