These three reading provide different views into American
food processing, an industry that is often under-regulated and over looked by
consumers. Pollan’s piece was by far the most interesting owing to his awesome
writing style and uncanny ability to relate his topic to the reader. “An Animal’s
Place” traces the domestication and production of animals through the lens of
our morality. The article was styled as a constant tug and pull between Pollan,
taking the chair of an average American consumer, and the philosophical book by Peter Singer ''Animal Liberation”. As with any philosophical
argument Singler’s ideas are subject to criticism from many people who do not
share his moral agenda.
The idea of equality for animals was one of the most
noteworthy and defining themes of this piece. Pollan posed the question; will
future generations judge us with the same severity as we impose on slavers and
the third reich? There is no doubt the idea of equality is rapidly gaining
ground, in the past 200 years it has been extended to African Americans, women,
and homosexuals. As the liberation movement moves forward will animals be the
next group to gain the same rights that us humans enjoy?
Estabrook’s Tomatoland
was more grounded in fact, absent the moral philosophizing of “An Animals
Place”. One of the most interesting facts is that tomatoes today are actually
much less healthy than they were in the 1960s. The author described the dirty
secrets behind a seemingly healthy harmless and “wholesomely grown” tomato. In
fact many of our supermarket tomatoes have been bloated full of pesticides and
other synthetic ingratiates. They are harvested by minimum wage immigrants, essentially
indentured servants, who are locked into work by economic and social conditions
instead of unpaid debt.
The infographic by Cook describes the same hardships for
workers in the poultry industry. Disease and workplace injury are rampant and
many of the immigrant workers have no union or insurance plan for protection. The
thing I liked most about this piece is that it was short and to the point,
without the literary styling’s of Estabrook and Pollan.
Tomatoland also asserts
a theme that was present in all three of the readings, many of the negative
aspects of the food industry can be traced back to a capitalist economy. The
need to achieve maximum production with minimal cost is why poulty and pigs
live disgusting, imprisoned lives and their slaughterers are paid so little for
dangerous and degrading work. Neither article insists that socialism is the
answer, instead Pollan asserts, “Were the walls of our meat industry to become
transparent, literally or even figuratively, we would not long continue to do
it this way.”
Good comparison. I'm totally with you on your assessment of Pollan's writing style. He relates the topic well to his readers in part by anticipating his readers' positions. The capitalistic connection was well stated, too.
ReplyDelete